Study: Sexual Harassment "Frequent and Distressing" for Women in Dublin

Last September, a study of sexual harassment in the city was completed for Dublin City Council. The findings? It’s a problem.

“The study findings show that sexual harassment is a frequent and distressing occurrence for women and girls in Dublin City,” says the unpublished report. To date, though, there doesn’t seem to have been much follow-up.

The research looked at the areas around the corridor stretching along the Luas, from Heuston Station to the Abbey Street Luas stop in the North Inner City.

Through group interviews and questionnaires, the researchers found that sexual harassment was a persistent problem for women of all ages and backgrounds. But some were targeted more than others: younger women, gay women, homeless women, immigrant women, Traveller women, Roma women, and sex workers.

It also suggests that the guys who are responsible are of every age and background.

Sexual harassment can be physical and can come in the form of unwanted pinching, slapping, grabbing or brushing up against someone in a public space, according to UN Women.

But it also includes unwelcome sexual comments, attention, actions, gestures, stalking or exposure of genitals.

The women who took part in the study described sexual harassment as “normalised”. Some of those interviewed experienced it in their school uniforms when they were as young as 14 years old – or, in one case, even 10.

Along the Luas Line

On a Monday evening by the Museum Luas stop in the inner city, five women who stopped to talk said they felt uneasy walking in the area at night. But none had experienced sexual harassment, they said.

Women who took part in the study described the stop as a “no-man’s land”. And for some, it can feel isolated and unsafe.

Gabrielle Hyde-Smith, from Australia, moved into the area about four months ago. She was a bit guarded at first, she said, but now she never feels unsafe in this area.

However, closer to the city centre — some of which also falls within the study area — is more of a problem for her, she says. She’s experienced catcalling there in the past.

“I feel more uncomfortable on O’Connell Street,” she says.

There hasn’t been much research done in Ireland about sexual harassment in public spaces.

In 1997, the Task Force on Violence Against Women published a report showing that most sexual violence takes place in the home, so intervention and research hasn’t focused on the issue in the public realm.

This most recent study came about as a by-product of the UN Women’s Safe Cities Global Initiative, which tries to make public spaces safer for women.

Dublin City Council signed up back in March 2013 and had to commission the study as part of the programme.

Jacqueline Healy, who works on women’s health and human rights at the National Women’s Council of Ireland (NWCI), was unaware of the study carried out by Dublin City Council. As was everyone in the various organisations that we contacted.

The NWCI has consistently called for a government-funded research project on the nature and extent of sexual harassment and violence in Ireland, she said.

The last report was the 2002 Sexual Abuse and Violence in Ireland (SAVI) report, says Healy. But this is considered out of date now.

At that time, the report found that 16 percent of the women interviewed had faced sexual harassment in the previous year.

“The issue of sexual harassment is of big concern to NWCI,” says Healy. “In our work with young women it emerged as a big issue during focus groups that were held last year and anecdotally we can see it is a big issue for women in all aspects of their lives, inside and outside the workplace.”

She says it’s hard to know to what extent sexual harassment is prevalent here without doing large-scale research. An EU study from 2013 showed that 48 percent of respondents in Ireland had experienced some form of sexual harassment since the age of 15.

Dublin City Council’s report found that sexual harassment is a “gender-based violence” and a violation of women’s human rights.

“It is indicative of on-going sexist attitudes towards women . . . It impedes women and girls’ freedom of movement in the city and causes long-term harm,” it says.

A Few Hazards

The study highlighted a long list of spots that women who were interviewed said they would avoid.

Montpellier Hill is one of these. The presence of prostitution means “kerb crawlers” are hanging around and interviewees said they frequently make sexual threats.

Along Temple Street West, inadequate lighting and a feel of neglect keep some women away.

Others said that the stretch from the Ashling Hotel to Smithfield was isolated, as was the walkway from Abbey Street to the Jervis Shopping Centre. There are certainly a large number of derelict sites along this part of the Luas red line, which might contribute to this.

Results from the 2013 EU-wide study showed Ireland has the second highest number of women avoiding places or situations for fear of being assaulted.

In lonely spots and unpopulated areas, women can feel unsafe, and those interviewed for the recent study on the north-west inner city said the poor condition of the area raised safety concerns.

Some said they would avoid neglected areas even if they hadn’t heard of or experienced any hassle there. This feeds a cycle where the more that people avoid places, the more desolate they become.

Women who worked or lived along the study site took part in a walk to identify the key design problems which made them feel unsafe. Top of the list was a lack of signage and lighting.

Éilis Ryan of the Workers’ Party knows the area well and says the two main issues there that the council could address are the lack of lighting and the high level of vacant sites.

She doesn’t get constituents complaining to her about sexual harassment, but says that based on her own experiences, this would help.

“Personally, they are the things that make me feel safe in other European cities, when there’s people living along the road where you’re walking,” she says. “That’s not the case in the North Inner City. There’s stretches of main roads with absolutely nothing happening in any building.”

Ryan believes there’s a huge difference in the amount of lighting in affluent and poorer areas. She’d like to see a study on this – one similar to the recent study done on the distribution of Dublin’s trees.

She lists off some places in her constituency that can be a bit dark and daunting.

Residents near O’Devaney Gardens have recently been asking for lights to be fixed along there, she says, but it hasn’t happened yet.

Some Other Ideas

Besides improving public spaces, the report also had a few other ideas to make a more women-friendly city.

The council should bring in educational programmes for the public and agencies such as An Garda Siochana, so it’s clear to them what constitutes sexual harassment, the report says.

A spokesperson for the Garda Press Office said the force was unaware of this recommendation, because it didn’t know the report existed.

The report also suggests launching a public-awareness campaign expressing a zero-tolerance for sexual harassment. Healy of the NWCI says a sending out a message of zero-tolerance is necessary to change the current culture.

It also proposes “gender-proofing” Dublin City Council policy documents regarding public space, so that proposals are of equal benefit to men and women.

It isn’t clear if the council have plans to act on these recommendations submitted last September. (Dublin City Council failed to respond to questions asking which, if any, recommendations were or would be put in place.)

Filed under:

Author:

Louisa McGrath: Louisa McGrath is a city reporter for Dublin Inquirer. You can reach her at lmcgrath@dubinq.com.

Reader responses

Log in to write a response.

Cliona Saidlear
at 12 May 2016 at 17:35

We (rcni) were part of the conversation alongside others on the dublin UN safe city initiative. Dublin aims to be the first city in the west to take up this challenge so this is very progressive. Study commissioned and its findings shows need to move carefully into the area of ‘street harassment’ which is culturally particular to different urban areas and not a universal. We need good evidence which does not risk assuming and reinforcing women’s vulnerability, fear (regardless of evidence), and having the impact of restricting and regulation women’s freedoms. We need to understand the particulars of our own urban spaces and lived lives and critically the hierarchies of harassment, rather than try to overlay one model (and seek evidence to back our assumptions) of harassment on diverse city, women and vulnerable people’s experiences.

D
at 18 May 2016 at 16:49

This is an interesting outcome to the study. I now live in London where in the last 10 months I have experienced harassment on an almost daily basis, ranging from touching to aggressively sexual threats. I haven’t lived in Dublin (where I lived until i was 27) for a while, but I’m don’t think I was aware of what sexual harassment was until recently – I had quite clearly normalised it to excuse it and not let it upset me.

John Gallen
at 3 October 2016 at 11:44

Why are men ignored in all the FRA studies…. Is it right to look at an ideologically driven research agency, even one recognised/funded by the EU?

Look, don’t get me wrong, all violence is wrong – #NobodyIsForHitting – but I wonder why does a ‘Fundamental Rights Agency’ with truck loads of research on violence not have one single piece of research on violence against men?

One of the world’s most foremost violence and domestic violence researchers and advocates for non-ideologically lead study in these areas, Senator Cool (Canadian) has issue with such research, and how it affects society through bias and heuristic thinking, and how gender-feminism, has damaged study in the area and set violence studies back decades.

It’s not me saying that, it’s the experts that don’t have an ideology leading their thinking, but have fairness and equality.

Lots more here from this most incredible of women…. in the last ten minutes she explains why the biases in advocacy research by gender-feminist agencies like the FRA are damaging.
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A…

Her bio – [http://senatorcools.sencanada.ca/…

I am a domestic violence survivor myself having shared my life with an abusive woman for between six and seven years, five of which were of the mentally, emotionally and psychologically abusive variety, that left me in a state of suicidal ideation on a daily basis; and the last two physically violent. Overall it left me with occurrences of ptsd years after the relationship ended. I’m in a much better place after two years of group and one to one counseling when I first sought help.

I realise, the specific content of my point is more about domestic violence, but the problems with the research stem from the same place, ie – ideologically lead research.

Please don’t try to take this as an attack on women or defence of violent persons (#NobodyIsForHitting) but a plea for people to look beyond heuristic thinking so prevalent in studies of violence – something that will never change if the research remains in the hands of ideologues.

For anyone who wishes to view more, this is a link to a presentation by Dr. Donald Dutton, UBC Professor of Psychology, to the Canadian Senate on, “An Empirical Approach to Innovations in Intimate Partner Violence Policy” introduced by Senator Cool – [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9…

I hope that someday, we in Ireland, will be mature enough to have a conversation like this and with an empirical approach to data and not advocacy lead by ideology.

Lois Kapila
at 3 October 2016 at 11:56

@John Gallen: Hi John, thanks for your contribution. I’ll definitely take a look at those links. Good to hear you are in a better place now.

John Gallen
at 4 October 2016 at 14:49

@John Gallen: While you have chosen to delete your comment Dublin Inquirer person, I do hope that you will continue to look into the travesty that is domestic violence, beyond the links I provided, and do so with a clear vision, and not through the blinkered ideological lens of gender-feminism.

NobobyIsForHitting

Lois Kapila
at 4 October 2016 at 14:55

@John Gallen: Not sure what you mean, John. No comments have been deleted.

John Gallen
at 4 October 2016 at 18:07

@John Gallen: OK… wasn’t there on two separate PC’s earlier today. Maybe the comments system has a bug.
I still do hope so desperately you find your reading of the problems of domestic violence intervention worthy of a piece on here some day. It’s such a bewildering injustice on so many people, yet perpetuated without a second thought… it saddens me no end, cheers Lois

John Gallen
at 5 October 2016 at 08:56

@Lois Kapila: Hi Lois, yep, same again, our last two comments didn’t appear on site on viewing this page at first, then I hit refresh and they appeared. Not really a bug I guess, but, just to let you know it is occurring. Thanks, John

Understand your city

We do in-depth, shoe-leather reporting about the issues that shape Dublin. We're not funded by advertisers. We're funded by readers like you.

We use first-party cookies to allow visitors to log in to our website and read our articles.